| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
vskgopu
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 6:59 pm Post subject: uC/OS-II Vs Drivers |
 |
|
Hi,
I am trying to understand the uCOS architecture. I understood that
drivers(like CAN, USB, etc..) should be created as TASKS for integrating
with uCOS. Is it correct ? Please correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks & Regards,
Gopu.S |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Vladimir Vassilevsky
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 8:21 pm Post subject: Re: uC/OS-II Vs Drivers |
|
|
vskgopu wrote:
| Quote: | Hi,
I am trying to understand the uCOS architecture. I understood that
drivers(like CAN, USB, etc..) should be created as TASKS for integrating
with uCOS. Is it correct ? Please correct me if I am wrong.
|
It depends.
Vladimir Vassilevsky
DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant
http://www.abvolt.com |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Not Really Me
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:24 pm Post subject: Re: uC/OS-II Vs Drivers |
|
|
vskgopu wrote:
| Quote: | Hi,
I am trying to understand the uCOS architecture. I understood that
drivers(like CAN, USB, etc..) should be created as TASKS for
integrating with uCOS. Is it correct ? Please correct me if I am
wrong.
Thanks & Regards,
Gopu.S
|
The functions that control these drivers are called from tasks, but the
drivers themselves are not necessarily "in" the task. Usually they are just
a part of the code set and their functions are called from within the tasks
that form your application. Some drivers like the TCP/IP stack utilize
other uCOS facilities like semaphores to control operation, but these are
requested/checked from within the applicatoin tasks.
Scott |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
vskgopu
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:35 pm Post subject: Re: uC/OS-II Vs Drivers |
|
|
| Thanks a lot for ur replies. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
CBFalconer
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:33 am Post subject: Re: uC/OS-II Vs Drivers |
|
|
vskgopu wrote:
| Quote: |
Thanks a lot for ur replies.
|
Who is ur? I didn't see any replies from him.
--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Grant Edwards
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:10 am Post subject: Re: uC/OS-II Vs Drivers |
|
|
On 2008-11-20, CBFalconer <cbfalconer@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | vskgopu wrote:
Thanks a lot for ur replies.
Who is ur?
|
Ur was an ancient Sumerian city near what was once the
mouth of the Euphrates river. Not real sure what it has to do
with uC/OS-II...
| Quote: | I didn't see any replies from him.
|
--
Grant |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
vskgopu
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:07 am Post subject: Re: uC/OS-II Vs Drivers |
|
|
| Quote: | On 2008-11-20, CBFalconer <cbfalconer@yahoo.com> wrote:
vskgopu wrote:
Thanks a lot for ur replies.
Who is ur?
Ur was an ancient Sumerian city near what was once the
mouth of the Euphrates river. Not real sure what it has to do
with uC/OS-II...
I didn't see any replies from him.
--
Grant
|
Sorry for the confusion. Here "ur" stands for "your". I meant to thank
"Vladimir Vassilevsky" and "Scott". |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
CBFalconer
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:07 am Post subject: Re: uC/OS-II Vs Drivers |
|
|
vskgopu wrote:
| Quote: | CBFalconer <cbfalconer@yahoo.com> wrote:
vskgopu wrote:
Thanks a lot for ur replies.
Who is ur?
Ur was an ancient Sumerian city near what was once the
mouth of the Euphrates river. Not real sure what it has to do
with uC/OS-II...
I didn't see any replies from him.
Sorry for the confusion. Here "ur" stands for "your". I meant
to thank "Vladimir Vassilevsky" and "Scott".
|
No confusion. I hope you have the idea. No silly abbreviations.
--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Charlie Springer
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:17 am Post subject: Re: uC/OS-II Vs Drivers |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:30:38 -0800, CBFalconer wrote
(in article <4924E7EE.3A08739B@yahoo.com>):
| Quote: | No confusion. I hope you have the idea. No silly abbreviations.
|
That would be NSA, one of the lesser used TLA's.
-- Charlie Springer |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
