| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jacko Guest
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 1:21 am Post subject: paper on ringfield numbers |
|
|
hi
As i is between - and +, then ringfield numbers are between / and *.
http://sites.google.com/site/jackokring past warning ringfields.pdf
attatchment at bottom of page. Possibly as useful as complex numbers.
A better symbolic notation is needed. The implication is that if
division logic is available, then there is no need for multiplication
logic. It needs some research to bring it upto the analytical level of
complex analysis.
cheers
jacko |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Guest
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 8:37 am Post subject: Re: paper on ringfield numbers |
|
|
In article <1174cdfd-5d08-41e9-8c71-582a867d9931@c36g2000prc.googlegroups.com>,
jacko <jackokring@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
As i is between - and +, then ringfield numbers are between / and *.
http://sites.google.com/site/jackokring past warning ringfields.pdf
attatchment at bottom of page. Possibly as useful as complex numbers.
A better symbolic notation is needed. The implication is that if
division logic is available, then there is no need for multiplication
logic. It needs some research to bring it upto the analytical level of
complex analysis.
|
That last sentence is very true.
Regards,
Nick Maclaren. |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
|