www.ShoppingPodder.com

Leading Computer Shopping,
News and information


Part of the Identityscape.com network...

getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

 

 

A Challenge for all TDD programmers, ICFP
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 198, 199, 200, 201, 202  Next
   Shopping Podder - the Best of Computer Postings! Forum Index -> Computer - Object  
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
krasicki
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 10:09 am    Post subject: Re: Avoiding the second historic mistake Reply with quote

Thank god the industry doesn't rush into things.
Back to top
Mike Schilling
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:19 pm    Post subject: Re: Avoiding the second historic mistake Reply with quote

"Patrick May" <pjm@spe.com> wrote in message
news:m2brby1fn2.fsf@gulch.intamission.com...
Quote:
tgm1024@hotmail.com writes:
Robert C. Martin wrote:
This isn't a slam against Java; I think Java is very cool. But
Java is not THE answer. Nor is it an unqualified improvement over
C++. It is just another interesting language. Thats all.

chuckle>. You are correct in every way, except Java /is/ the
answer and is an unqualified improvement over C++.

Actually, Mr. Martin is entirely correct when he states that Java
is not an unqualified improvement over C++. Where he is incorrect is
in claiming that Java is interesting.


It's not even original; most of Java is stolen from C#.
Back to top
toby
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:27 pm    Post subject: Re: Avoiding the second historic mistake Reply with quote

Please substantiate.
Back to top
Morten Alver
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:38 pm    Post subject: OT: Re: Avoiding the second historic mistake Reply with quote

Quote:
chuckle>. You are correct in every way, except Java /is/ the answer
and is an unqualified improvement over C++.

Is it a bad sign when I find myself wondering where the </chuckle> tag is?


--
Morten
Back to top
krasicki
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:53 pm    Post subject: Re: Avoiding the second historic mistake Reply with quote

Didn't you read "The Road Ahead"? C'mon.
Back to top
Thomas G. Marshall
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 10:52 pm    Post subject: Re: Avoiding the second historic mistake Reply with quote

Jimmy Cerra coughed up:
Quote:
Robert C. Martin wrote:
This isn't a slam against Java; I think Java is very cool. But
Java is not THE answer. Nor is it an unqualified improvement over
C++. It is just another interesting language. Thats all.

tgm1024@hotmail.com wrote:
chuckle>. You are correct in every way, except Java /is/ the answer
and is an unqualified improvement over C++.

You're replying to a post over seven years ago! Are you trying to
start a flame war? -- Jimmy Cerra

AH HA. SOMEONE GOT IT!

I was wondering if anyone was going to remember this uber-thread of yore.
Man, "those were the days", ;)

--
It'salwaysbeenmygoalinlifetocreateasignaturethatendedwiththeword"blarphoogy"
..
Back to top
Mike Schilling
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:57 pm    Post subject: Re: Avoiding the second historic mistake Reply with quote

"toby" <toby@telegraphics.com.au> wrote in message
news:1105342050.050060.100920@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
Please substantiate.

(It was a joke.)
Back to top
Robert C. Martin
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 12:47 am    Post subject: Re: Avoiding the second historic mistake Reply with quote

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 06:19:55 GMT, "Mike Schilling"
<mscottschilling@hotmail.com> wrote:

Quote:

"Patrick May" <pjm@spe.com> wrote in message
news:m2brby1fn2.fsf@gulch.intamission.com...
tgm1024@hotmail.com writes:
Robert C. Martin wrote:
This isn't a slam against Java; I think Java is very cool. But
Java is not THE answer. Nor is it an unqualified improvement over
C++. It is just another interesting language. Thats all.

chuckle>. You are correct in every way, except Java /is/ the
answer and is an unqualified improvement over C++.

Actually, Mr. Martin is entirely correct when he states that Java
is not an unqualified improvement over C++. Where he is incorrect is
in claiming that Java is interesting.


It's not even original; most of Java is stolen from C#.

;-)



-----
Robert C. Martin (Uncle Bob) | email: unclebob@objectmentor.com
Object Mentor Inc. | blog: www.butunclebob.com
The Agile Transition Experts | web: www.objectmentor.com
800-338-6716


"The aim of science is not to open the door to infinite wisdom,
but to set a limit to infinite error."
-- Bertolt Brecht, Life of Galileo
Back to top
The Ghost In The Machine
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:01 am    Post subject: Re: Avoiding the second historic mistake Reply with quote

In comp.lang.java.advocacy, Mike Schilling
<mscottschilling@hotmail.com>
wrote
on Mon, 10 Jan 2005 06:19:55 GMT
<f8pEd.347$8Z1.160@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>:
Quote:

"Patrick May" <pjm@spe.com> wrote in message
news:m2brby1fn2.fsf@gulch.intamission.com...
tgm1024@hotmail.com writes:
Robert C. Martin wrote:
This isn't a slam against Java; I think Java is very cool. But
Java is not THE answer. Nor is it an unqualified improvement over
C++. It is just another interesting language. Thats all.

chuckle>. You are correct in every way, except Java /is/ the
answer and is an unqualified improvement over C++.

Actually, Mr. Martin is entirely correct when he states that Java
is not an unqualified improvement over C++. Where he is incorrect is
in claiming that Java is interesting.


It's not even original; most of Java is stolen from C#.


An interesting notion. Did McNealy have a time machine or something?

:-)

--
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
It's still legal to go .sigless.
Back to top
Rod Davison
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:02 am    Post subject: Re: Avoiding the second historic mistake (oh puleez) Reply with quote

Overheard:

"Programming with C is like using a sharp knife with no handle. C++ has
made the knife much sharper. Java glued the knife in the sheath."

Whether this is good or bad depends on your biases. Remember that those
who sell short, an increase in th eprice of a stock they hold is a
bad thing.

Programming languages are apolitical (with the exception of a short lived
Berkly commentary on BSD in the 70s which went something like "There is no
wheel group in BSD because this creates a bourgeoisie set of class
distinction between users. Unix is a non-fascist operating system."

By the way, if anyone still has the original of th eabove quote, I would
love to hear from you!!

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 12:04:43 -0800, tgm102 wrote:

Quote:
Robert C. Martin wrote:

...[rip]...


This isn't a slam against Java; I think Java is very cool. But Java
is
not THE answer. Nor is it an unqualified improvement over C++. It
is
just another interesting language. Thats all.


chuckle>. You are correct in every way, except Java /is/ the answer and
is an unqualified improvement over C++.


...[rip]...

--
..................................................
I put instant coffee in a microwave and almost went back in time. -- Steven Wright

Rod Davison - Critical Knowledge Systems Inc.
Back to top
krasicki
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 2:09 am    Post subject: Re: Avoiding the second historic mistake Reply with quote

Not in Seattle!
Back to top
Boudewijn Dijkstra
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 2:21 am    Post subject: Re: Avoiding the second historic mistake (oh puleez) Reply with quote

"Rod Davison" <critsys@rogers.remove.com> schreef in bericht
news:pan.2005.01.10.19.02.24.396627@rogers.remove.com...
Quote:
Overheard:

"Programming with C is like using a sharp knife with no handle. C++ has
made the knife much sharper. Java glued the knife in the sheath."

How about: Java surrounded the knife with a maze.
Back to top
The Ghost In The Machine
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 4:01 am    Post subject: Re: Avoiding the second historic mistake (oh puleez) Reply with quote

In comp.lang.java.advocacy, Rod Davison
<critsys@rogers.remove.com>
wrote
on Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:02:34 -0500
<pan.2005.01.10.19.02.24.396627@rogers.remove.com>:
Quote:
Overheard:

"Programming with C is like using a sharp knife with no handle. C++ has
made the knife much sharper. Java glued the knife in the sheath."

One wonders what C# did. :-)

Quote:

Whether this is good or bad depends on your biases. Remember that those
who sell short, an increase in th eprice of a stock they hold is a
bad thing.

Programming languages are apolitical (with the exception of a short lived
Berkly commentary on BSD in the 70s which went something like "There is no
wheel group in BSD because this creates a bourgeoisie set of class
distinction between users. Unix is a non-fascist operating system."

By the way, if anyone still has the original of th eabove quote, I would
love to hear from you!!

An odd comment considering that "root" is absolute dictator. :-)

Quote:

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 12:04:43 -0800, tgm102 wrote:

Robert C. Martin wrote:

...[rip]...


This isn't a slam against Java; I think Java is very cool. But Java
is
not THE answer. Nor is it an unqualified improvement over C++. It
is
just another interesting language. Thats all.


chuckle>. You are correct in every way, except Java /is/ the answer and
is an unqualified improvement over C++.


...[rip]...



--
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
It's still legal to go .sigless.
Back to top
Mike Schilling
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 4:35 am    Post subject: Re: Avoiding the second historic mistake (oh puleez) Reply with quote

"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> wrote in
message news:065bb2-r2f.ln1@sirius.athghost7038suus.net...
Quote:
In comp.lang.java.advocacy, Rod Davison
critsys@rogers.remove.com
wrote
on Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:02:34 -0500
pan.2005.01.10.19.02.24.396627@rogers.remove.com>:
Overheard:

"Programming with C is like using a sharp knife with no handle. C++ has
made the knife much sharper. Java glued the knife in the sheath."

One wonders what C# did. Smile

Painted the sheath, which had previously been brown, light brown.
Back to top
Jörn W. Janneck
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 4:51 am    Post subject: Re: Avoiding the second historic mistake (oh puleez) Reply with quote

"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> wrote in
message news:065bb2-r2f.ln1@sirius.athghost7038suus.net...
Quote:
In comp.lang.java.advocacy, Rod Davison
critsys@rogers.remove.com
wrote
on Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:02:34 -0500
pan.2005.01.10.19.02.24.396627@rogers.remove.com>:
Overheard:

"Programming with C is like using a sharp knife with no handle. C++ has
made the knife much sharper. Java glued the knife in the sheath."

One wonders what C# did. Smile

it took the glued knife in the sheath, sharpened part of the sheath, and
spray painted the whole thing with glitter paint. then, ms patented it.

;-)

-- j
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
   Shopping Podder - the Best of Computer Postings! Forum Index -> Computer - Object Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 198, 199, 200, 201, 202  Next  
Page 199 of 202
All times are GMT

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum